Mississippi Legislative Report, 2012

Checking the Mississippi Legislature website, I see three bills that should be of interest to Mississippi gun owners.

The first is SB2128, which provides limited immunity for emergency management workers. I have had a couple of runins with fatheads while surveying damage, so I would ordinarily be in favor. Unfortunately, this one reads like it was written by a Homeland Security bureaucrat or a TSA groper, and allows the suspension of sale of firearms and other items during an emergency. NO GOOD!

The second is S.B. 2136, which provides for an open carry permit for bank guards, security guards, railroad special agents, agents of a patrol service, and so on. If we cannot have Constitutional Carry I suppose an exemption for those whose livelihood depends on open carry is acceptable.

The third is S.B. 2140, which provides that habitual (career) criminals, most sex offenders, armed robbers, and certain other convicted felons will not be eligible for any sort of good time. This one is by Senator Percy Watson, whose office is just up the street from mine. I will have to thank Percy the next time I see him.

And I will keep on checking as the Legislative year goes on.

Stranger

Posted in GUN LAWS | Leave a comment

FEDEX Worker Convicted Of Gun Theft

A Lewiston, Maine Fedex worker was given almost 12 years for stealing a shotgun from the Fedex distribution center and selling it on the street.

Briefly quoting the Sun Journal item linked above:

In September 2009 Adams was working at the distribution center in Lewiston when he came across a package marked “firearm,” according to documents from U.S. District Court.

The gun had been sent from Texas and was supposed to be shipped to a gunsmith in Harpswell. But prosecutors said Adams took the Beretta 12-gauge shotgun home with him, stashing it in a co-worker’s car before leaving work.

Four days later, Adams sold the gun to another man for $150, prosecutors said. The man who bought the weapon paid for it with a check, according to a court document, jotting the serial number of the stolen gun in the memo field.

Theft from a carrier is a far more common crime than many realize. Studies show that two percent of stolen guns recovered were taken from delivery services, such as UPS, Fedex, or the US Post Office. There is at least one case on record where a DC gang member managed to be assigned to a route that picked up guns from a Virginia importer. The guns he picked up went straight to the streets of Washington and Baltimore.

Adams has an extensive criminal record, including convictions for sexual abuse of a minor, burglary, robbery, and trafficking in scheduled drugs. And he was put to work in a parcel service distribution center?

Adams gets twelve years for stealing a gun, and being a felon in possession. That’s a little light, but it’s 143 months more than most gun thieves get. And about 120 months more than Adams is likely to serve. After all, it was a “non-violent crime.” Kudos to the judge for handing down an adequate penalty. Now, if he is just made to serve it.

It would really be helpful if judges, prosecutors, and parole boards would realize that here in the real world, more than nine out of ten gun related crimes are committed with stolen “street” guns. A wrist slap is no deterrent to gun thieves at all.

Gun theft is grand larceny. Being a felon in possession of a gun is a major crime. Taking a stolen gun across a state line is another major crime. Selling a stolen gun is worth several years of prison time. And yet gun thieves, street corner gun dealers, and those who transport stolen guns across state lines will serve about the same amount of prison time as a thief who steals a box of chocolate covered cherries.

There is a complete lack of responsibility to the public in our truly criminal justice system.

Stranger

Posted in GUN THEFT | Leave a comment

Michael Talks About Derringers

I see my favorite holster maker, Micheal at the Holster Site, has a few very well chosen words about “derringers.

I pretty much second the motion. Back when black powder was the only gun powder, and gamblers needed a “hideout gun,” there was some reason for these tiny two shooters to be popular.

As demonstrated by a man who was a Ranger in the “smoky seventies,” a gambler dressed in the height of fashion needed only to lift his “off hand shoulder” as high as possible to have two shots comfortably nestled in the palm of his gun hand. That was far faster than the same card sharp could fumble a six shooter out of his hip pocket.

The old .41 rimfire, loaded with three grains of ffg, was lethal at poker table ranges. As several sore losers among the gambling fraternity learned – too late.

But now we have perfectly competent and reliable .380/9mm handguns that are little larger than Remington’s Number 95 – in calibers much more effective than the old .41 RF.

What we do not have are the stylish puffed sleeves, separate cuffs and collars, and the elastic bands that made the derringer in a “clip on wrist” holster “sleeve wear,” and a practical dress accessory.

Michael discusses carrying in the post linked above. And he does a very good job of it, so click on the link and read it all. Me?

Well, I am not exactly anyone’s picture of a 77, soon to be 78, year old. At 5’11, I need to get back to my pre-Katrina weight of 200. But right now I am carrying a Remington 1911 in one of Micheal’s kidney holsters. It’s perfectly comfortable, and the CCTV camera says I would be hard to make.

Bottom line? A Deringer is a fine thing – to collect. So is a derringer. I own several. But I have no desire to fire one of them. And even less desire to carry one.

Stranger

Posted in HOLSTER TALK | Leave a comment

Houston: “Hundreds Of Guns Stolen In Professional Burglaries”

Houston, Texas’ ABC outlet, KTRK reports 274 guns have been stolen in a half dozen pawn shop burglaries in the Houston area.

Briefly quoting the KTRK item linked above:

“This is an organized group without a doubt and we can back that up with our investigation,” said Lt. Jeff Stauber with the Harris County Sheriff’s Office.

“They are not smash and grabs. These guys are organized. They are watching federal firearms licensees. Therefore licensees need to make sure cameras are operational, security systems up to date. We request public’s assistance in recovering these guns,” said ATF Special Agent in Charge Gary Orchowski.

Of course, we know that the overwhelming majority of gun related crimes are committed with stolen guns. Given the population of the Houston metro area, there are probably 75 to 100 guns a week stolen in the area. So while 274 guns in six weeks is a lot, it will not materially increase the number of guns available to the underworld.

While a gang of gun thieves is not a new thing, it is unusual. And it is worrying.

It would be a really good idea for everyone with a gun to beef up security. You cannot stop thieves from stealing your guns, but you can make it so time consuming they will pass up the opportunity.

Stranger

Posted in GUN THEFT | Leave a comment

FBI Reveals Plans to “Monitor Social Media”

New Scientist reports the FBI has quietly released its plans to monitor Twitter, Facebook, and other so-called “social media.

That must have been a Friday night release, because I missed it. Briefly quoting from the New Scientist web report linked above:

The document suggests that the bureau wants to use social media to target specific users or groups of users. It notes that agents need to “locate bad actors…and analyze their movements, vulnerabilities, limitations, and possible adverse actions”. It also states that the bureau will use social media to create “pattern-of-life matrices” — presumably logs of targets’ daily routines — that will aid law enforcement in planning operations.

While the Geheime Staatspolize used Hitler Jugend members instead of “social media,” the theory is an old one. Given the many other Obama regime actions lately, including the indefinite detention bill, Homeland Security’s plans, and now this, it appears our government is quickly coming to regard the American people as a threat. Something that cannot be tolerated in a Constitutional democracy.

Your vote is more important than ever, now. Not one of those who permit this sort of activity can be allowed to remain in public office.

Stranger

Posted in OFFICIAL ABUSE | Leave a comment

How Much Does The Joyce Foundation Give To Anti Gun Causes?

Someone stopped by searching for “how much does the joyce foundation give to gun control groups.”

The Joyce Foundation gives a staggering amount to various anti-gun organizations. At the bottom of this post there is a list of grants to gun ban groups for 2012, which, if I have not left one out, comes to $3,189,668. And the Tides and MacArthur Foundations reportedly hand out at least an equivalent amount to gun control groups.

One of the more interesting grants listed under “gun violence” is that series of three grants, totaling $790,000, on April 26, 2011, to the New Venture Fund.

One of the New Venture Fund’s grants has as its stated purpose “To support messaging research on gun violence and gun policy.” But Fund’s web page, linked above, or it’s Federal Form 990 say very little about its gun control activities.

That said, here is the tip of the iceberg, The Joyce Foundation’s list of gun control groups it provided funding during 2011.

Ceasefire Pennsylvania Education Fund
To support public engagement for gun violence prevention policies in Pennsylvania. PA…Philadelphia $65,000.00 6 07/19/2011

Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence
To build awareness around public policy objectives to improve community safety. IL, Chicago…$175,000.00 6…07/19/2011

The Police Foundation
policefoundation.org
To support management of activities of the National Law Enforcement Partnership. DC, Washington… $199,952.00 12 07/19/2011

United Against Illegal Guns Support Fund
For continued support of the Mayors Against Illegal Guns. NY, New York $650,000.00…12…07/19/2011

WAVE Educational Fund
For continued development and implementation of a comprehensive plan to prevent gun violence in Wisconsin and across the country. WI, Milwaukee…$415,000.00 12…07/19/2011

American College of Preventive Medicine
www.acpm.org
For an education and advocacy campaign aimed at expanding the National Violent Death Reporting System to all 50 states. DC, Washington $234,716.00 12…04/26/2011

Citizens for a Safer Minnesota Education Fund
www.endgunviolence.com
To support organizing project on gun violence prevention. MN, St. Paul…$60,000.00 12…04/26/2011

Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence
www.csgv.org
To build national coalitions in support of policies to reduce illegal gun trafficking and to develop a communications frame for the gun violence prevention movement. DC, Washington $125,000.00 12…
04/26/2011

New Venture Fund
www.newventurefund.org
To support messaging research on gun violence and gun policy. DC, Washington…$220,000.00 12 04/26/2011

New Venture Fund
www.newventurefund.org
To support the development and launch of a new online organization. DC, Washington…$205,000.00 12 04/26/2011

New Venture Fund
www.newventurefund.org
To support the development and launch of a new online organization. DC, Washington …$365,000.00 12 04/26/2011

Ohio Coalition Against Gun Violence
www.ohioceasefire.org
To support an organizer to focus on building support for expanded background checks, opposition to expanded concealed carry, and organizing faith communities. OH, Toledo…$75,000.00 12 04/26/2011

Police Executive Research Forum
www.policeforum.org
to conduct new research on gun violence and gun policy issues, host a national town hall meeting to present and discuss research findings, and to educate the public and policy makers about gun violence issues that impact the law enforcement community. DC, Washington…$375,000.00 18 04/26/2011

States United to Prevent Gun Violence
www.supgv.org
For continued support to strengthen gun violence prevention organizations. IL, Chicago $25,000.00 12 04/26/2011

Obviously, even the tip of the iceberg amounts to a great deal of money. Our opponents are well funded, well organized, and they are not going away willingly.

Stranger

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Emily To Testify Before The DC Council

Emily Miller, whose travails in trying to buy a gun in Washington DC I have posted about several times, will testify before the Washington City Council’s Judiciary Committee on January 30.

One need only look at the District’s 601,000 population, 8,004 admitted violent crimes, 132 reported murders, 4325 robberies and 3,360 burglaries during 2010:

And compare that with almost any similar size American city with relaxed gun laws, such as El Paso, Texas, with 624,000 population, 2,861 violent crimes, 5 murders, 479 robberies, and 1,953 burglaries;

Or to North Carolina’s Charlotte-Mecklinburg, with it’s 797,000 population, almost one third greater than DC’s, with its 4,891 serious crimes, 61 murders, 1,795 robberies, and 9325 burglaries.

Obviously, in El Paso, where any law abiding citizen who wants a gun can buy one and criminals run a substantial risk of encountering an armed “victim,” the rates for all major types of violent crime are very low.

Looking at Charlotte, where the gun laws are mildly restrictive and more or less typical of most American states, the crime rate is substantially higher than El Paso. Especially the incidence of burglary, where a careful burglar runs very little chance of encountering an armed victim.

But looking at DC, we see the number of murders dropped sharply after the Heller decision, but the homicide rate was still 22 per 100,000 population. And the rates for every category of crime are sky high.

You can run similar comparisons all day long and you will find similar results. Those jurisdictions, cities and states, with the least restrictive gun laws have the lowest violent crime rates. But they have the highest rates of armed self defense – which is the reason the crime rates are low and the livability is high.

In essentially banning guns, and therefore banning self defense, the District of Columbia has ceded the rule of our nation’s capital’s streets to the criminals. And that is unsatisfactory.

Stranger

Posted in DC | Leave a comment

Three Anti-Gun, and Therefore Pro-Crime Bills Moving In Illinois

Three anti gun bills are moving in the Illinois Legislature. The first would ban a wide range of “semi-automatic assault weapons,” normal capacity magazines and other gun related items.

That bill is House Bill 1294, sponsored by Rep. Edward J. Acevedo – Ann Williams – Greg Harris – Barbara Flynn Currie, Karen May, Carol A. Sente, Deborah Mell and Marlow H. Colvin.

The synopsis reads:

Amends the Criminal Code of 1961. Provides that 90 days after the effective date of this amendatory Act, it is unlawful for any person within this State to knowingly manufacture, deliver, sell, purchase, or possess or cause to be manufactured, delivered, sold, purchased, or possessed a semi-automatic assault weapon, an assault weapon attachment, any .50 caliber rifle, or .50 caliber cartridge. Provides that beginning 90 days after the effective date of this amendatory Act, it is unlawful for any person within this State to knowingly manufacture, deliver, sell, purchase, or possess or cause to be manufactured, delivered, sold, purchased, or possessed a large capacity ammunition feeding device. Provides that these provisions do not apply to a person who possessed a prohibited weapon, device, or attachment before the effective date of this amendatory Act if the person has provided proof of ownership to the Department of State Police within 90 days after the effective date of this amendatory Act. Provides that on or after the effective date of this amendatory Act, such person may transfer such device only to an heir, an individual residing in another state maintaining that device in another state, or a dealer licensed as a federal firearms dealer. Specifies penalties for violations. Provides exemptions. Provides that the provisions of the Act are severable. Effective immediately.

The second bill is House Bill 1599, by Rep. Edward J. Acevedo.

The synopsis reads

Amends the Criminal Code of 1961 relating to unlawful use of weapons. Increases the penalties by one class if a semi-automatic assault weapon or high capacity ammunition was possessed in the commission of the offense. Defines “semi-automatic assault weapon” and “high capacity ammunition”. Effective immediately.

The third of this evil trio is House Bill 1855 by Edward J. Acevedo, Maria Antonia Berrios and Luis Arroyo

The synopsis reads:

mends the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act. Provides that the Department of State Police may revoke and seize a Firearm Owner’s Identification Card previously issued under the Act of a person who fails to report the loss or theft of a handgun a second time to the local law enforcement agency within 72 hours after obtaining knowledge of the second loss or theft. Amends the Criminal Code of 1961. Provides that if a person who possesses a valid Firearm Owner’s Identification Card and who possesses or acquires a handgun thereafter loses or misplaces the handgun, or if the handgun is stolen from the person, the person must report the loss or theft to the local law enforcement agency within 72 hours after obtaining knowledge of the loss or theft. Effective immediately.

Now, let’s look at the cast of characters behind these bills.

Starting with Ed Acevedo, “Democrat,” represents Chicago, and a member of the Chicago combine.

Maria Antonia Berrios Demo, Chicago, is a member of the Chicago Combine.

Luis Arroyo, Dem, Chicago, is a member of the Chicago Combine.

Ann Williams (D), Chicago, is a member of the Chicago Combine.

Greg Harris (D), Chicago, is a member of the Chicago Combine.

Barbara Flynn Currie (D), Chicago, is a member of the Chicago Combine.

Karen May (D), King County, Highwood, a Chicago suburb.

Carol A. Sente (D), Lake County, Lincolnshire, a Chicago suburb.

Deborah Mell (D), Chicago, Alderman Mell’s daughter, a member of the Chicago Combine.

Marlow H. Colvin (D), Chicago, member of the Chicago Combine.

So all but two of the sponsors are recognized members of the Combine, and May and Sente may be. These are Rhambo’s gun control bills.

If you live in Illinois please call your legislator and register your displeasure. You can find your Representative’s telephone number by clicking here.

Stranger

Posted in GUN LAWS | Leave a comment

85% Of Americans Believe Second Amendment Gives Right To Keep And Bear; 7% disagree

The Angus Reed polling organization has essentially verified common knowledge, finding that 85 percent of Americans believe the Second Amendment grants Americans the right to keep and carry firearms.

Given the poll’s four percent margin of error, this supports other polls that show 88 to 93 percent of Americans hold similar views.

I see we have some public education to do on self loading firearms, one of the gun control industry’s constant harping points. Briefly quoting from the Angus Reed poll linked above:

Seven-in-ten Americans hold no reservations about people who are eligible to own firearms having access to handguns (73%) and rifles or shotguns (72%). However, only three-in-ten respondents (30%) feel the same way about semi-automatic weapons, with a majority (61%) suggesting that only the police and other authorized persons should have access to them.

There is obviously public confusion between self loading firearms, and full auto firearms. Confusion that has been deliberately fostered by the gun control industry and their media collaborators.

Well, educating people is just work. And much more pleasant work that than cleaning up behind the parade.

Stranger

Posted in POLLS | 1 Comment

“The Gun Is The Most Important Instrument For World Peace”

Peter van Uhm, Chief of Defense for the Netherlands, has a few words about life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. And the gun’s relationship between those concepts – and the gun.

As van Uhm says:

“The gun may be one of the most important instruments of peace and stability that we have in this world.”

There are only two ways to get people to do what you want them to do. You can persuade them with words – or use brutal force them to comply with your edicts. Every tyrant in history has forced people to comply with edicts backed by brute force. Every tyrant in history has disarmed their subjects. Every would be tyrant in history, and every would be tyrant strutting across the world stage now, would first disarm the people.

The gun’s many uses in sport, for competition, and for self defense fully justify private citizens right to purchase and to possess firearms. Those who would deprive the people the right to keep and bear arms are either working toward a totalitarian state – or are unwittingly preparing the way for a police state.

And that is what gun bans are all about.

Stranger

Posted in GUN RIGHTS | Leave a comment